Sunday, June 16, 2024

A00038 - Charles Hamilton Houston (Class of 1915), Dunbar Graduate and Omega Phi Psi Member Who Became the Legal Architect of Desegregation

 

Charles Hamilton Houston

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Charles Houston
Born
Charles Hamilton Houston

September 3, 1895
DiedApril 22, 1950 (aged 54)
Washington, D.C., U.S.
Resting placeLincoln Memorial Cemetery
EducationAmherst College (BA)
Harvard University (LLBLLMSJD)

Charles Hamilton Houston (September 3, 1895 – April 22, 1950)[1] was an American lawyer. He was the dean of Howard University Law School and NAACP first special counsel. A graduate of Amherst College and Harvard Law School, Houston played a significant role in dismantling Jim Crow laws, especially attacking segregation in schools and racial housing covenants. He earned the title "The Man Who Killed Jim Crow".[2]

Houston is also well known for having trained and mentored a generation of black attorneys, including Thurgood Marshall, future founder and director of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the first Black Supreme Court Justice.[3] He recruited young lawyers to work on the NAACP's litigation campaigns, building connections between Howard's and Harvard's university law schools.

Biography[edit]

Early years[edit]

Houston was born in Washington, D.C., to a middle-class family who lived in the Strivers' section. His father William Le Pré Houston, the son of a former slave, had become an attorney and practiced in the capital for more than four decades. Charles' mother, Mary (born Hamilton) Houston, worked as a seamstress.[4] Houston attended segregated local schools, entering M Street High School (now Dunbar) at the age of 12 and graduating at age 15.[5] He studied at Amherst College beginning in 1911, was elected to the Phi Beta Kappa honor society,[1] and graduated as valedictorian in 1915 at age 20, and the only black student in his class. He returned to D.C. and taught English at Howard University, a historically black college.

As the U.S. entered World War I, Houston joined the U.S. Army as an officer. The military was racially segregated. From 1917 to 1919, he served as a First Lieutenant in the United States Infantry, based in Fort Meade, Maryland, with service in France. After being chastised for, during a brief detail as a Judge Advocate, finding a Black sergeant not worthy of prosecution, Houston wrote later:

The hate and scorn showered on us Negro officers by our fellow Americans convinced me that there was no sense in my dying for a world ruled by them. I made up my mind that if I got through this war I would study law and use my time fighting for men who could not strike back.[1][6]

After his return to the U.S. in 1919, he entered Harvard Law School. He was the first black student elected to the editorial board of the Harvard Law Review and graduated cum laude. Houston was also a member of Alpha Phi Alpha fraternity. He earned a bachelor's of law in 1922 and a DJS from Harvard in 1923. That same year he was awarded a Sheldon Traveling Fellowship to study at the University of Madrid. After his return, he was admitted to the Washington, DC bar in 1924 and joined his father's practice.[7]

Personal life[edit]

In 1924 Houston married Gladys Moran. They divorced in 1937. He next married Henrietta Williams. They had Houston's only child in 1940, Charles Hamilton Houston, Jr.[8] Houston was a founding member of the affiliated Washington Bar Association.

He was recruited to the Howard University faculty by the school's first African-American president, Mordecai Johnson. From 1929 to 1935, Houston served as Vice-Dean and Dean of the Howard University School of Law. He developed the school, beginning its years as a major national center for training black lawyers. He extended its part-time program to a full-time curriculum and gained accreditation by the Association of American Law Schools and the American Bar Association. Bringing prominent attorneys to the school as speakers and to build a law network for his students, Houston served as a mentor to a generation. He influenced nearly one-quarter of all the black lawyers in the United States at the time, including former student Thurgood Marshall, who became a United States Supreme Court justice.[9] Houston believed that the law could be used to fight racial discrimination and encouraged his students to work for such social purpose.

Houston left Howard in 1935 to serve as the first special counsel for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), serving in this role until 1940. In this capacity he created litigation strategies to attack racial housing covenants and segregated schools, arguing several important civil rights cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. Through his work at the NAACP, Houston played a role in nearly every civil rights case that reached the US Supreme Court between 1930 and Brown v. Board of Education (1954).[10]

Houston worked to bring an end to the exclusion of African Americans from juries across the South. He defended African-American George Crawford on charges of murder in Loudoun County, Virginia, in 1933, and saved him from the electric chair.[11]

In the related Hollins v. State of Oklahoma (1935), Houston led an all-black legal team before the US Supreme Court to appeal another murder case in which the defendant was convicted by an all-white jury and sentenced to death. The defense team had challenged the all-white jury during the trial, but the conviction was upheld by the appeals court. Hearing the case a certiorari, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision and ordered a new trial. Hollins was tried a third time, again before an all-white jury, and was convicted in 1936. He was sentenced to life in prison, where he died in 1950.[12] At the time, Oklahoma and southern states systematically excluded blacks from juries, in part because they were not on the voter rolls, having been disenfranchised across the South since the turn of the century by state barriers to voter registration. In the 21st century, attorneys continue to have to challenge prosecutorial strategies that exclude blacks from juries.[13][14]

Houston's strategy on public education was to attack segregation by demonstrating the inequality resulting from the "separate but equal" doctrine dating from the Supreme Court's Plessy v. Ferguson (1897). He orchestrated a campaign to force southern districts to build facilities for blacks equal to those for whites, or to integrate their facilities. He focused on law schools because, at the time, mostly males attended them. He believed this would obviate the fears whites expressed that integrated schools would lead to interracial dating and marriage.[10] In Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1939), Houston argued that it was unconstitutional for Missouri to exclude blacks from the state's university law school when, under the "separate but equal" provision, no comparable facility for blacks existed within the state.

In the documentary "The Road to Brown", Hon. Juanita Kidd Stout described Houston's strategy related to segregated schools:

When he attacked the "separate but equal" theory his real thought behind it was that "All right, if you want it separate but equal, I will make it so expensive for it to be separate that you will have to abandon your separateness." And so that was the reason he started demanding equalization of salaries for teachers, equal facilities in the schools and all of that.[15]

Houston founded a law firm, Houston & Gardner, with Wendell P. Gardner, Sr. It later included, as name partners, William H. HastieWilliam B. BryantEmmet G. Sullivan, and Joseph C. Waddy, each of whom were later appointed as federal judges.[16][17][18] The firm was prestigious but their work not well-compensated.[18][19][17] In all, ten members of the firm advanced to become judges, including Theodore Newman and Wendell Gardner, Jr., the son of Wendell Gardner.[20][19]

Houston's efforts to dismantle the legal theory of "separate but equal" were completed after his death in 1950 with the historic Brown v. Board of Education (1954) ruling, which prohibited segregation in public schools. At one point Houston had carried a movie camera as he traveled across South Carolina, in order to document the inequalities of facilities, materials and teachers' salaries between African-American and white education. As Special Counsel to the NAACP, Houston dispatched Thurgood MarshallOliver Hill and other young attorneys to work a litigation campaign of court challenges to equalize teachers' salaries.[15]

Houston also directed the NAACP's campaign to end restrictive housing covenants. In the early 20th century, the organization had won a United States Supreme Court case, Buchanan v. Warley (1917), which prohibited state and local jurisdictions from establishing restrictive housing. Real estate developers and agents developed restrictive covenants and deeds. The Court ruled in Corrigan v. Buckley (1926) that such restrictions were the acts of individuals and beyond the reach of the constitutional protections. As the NAACP continued with its campaign in the 1940s, Houston drew from contemporary sociological and other studies to demonstrate that such covenants and resulting segregation produced conditions of overcrowding, poor health, and increased crime that adversely affected African-American communities.[21] Following Corrigan, Houston contributed to what was a 22-year campaign, in concert with lawyers he had trained, in order to overturn the constitutionality of restrictive covenants. This was achieved in the US Supreme Court ruling in Shelley v. Kraemer (1948). The court ruled that "judicial enforcement of private right constitutes state action for the purpose of the fourteenth amendment."[22] Houston's use of sociological materials in these cases lay the groundwork for the approach and ruling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954).[22]

Death[edit]

Houston died from a heart attack on April 22, 1950, at the age of 54.[23]

Legacy and honors[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b c NAACP History: Charles Hamilton Houston Archived August 7, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, NAACP.org. Retrieved March 6, 2014.
  2. ^ "The Man Who Killed Jim Crow: Charles Hamilton Houston - Skilled litigator and legal educator launches the assault on segregation"America.gov. October 20, 2012. Archived from the original on February 28, 2010. Retrieved October 14, 2009.
  3. ^ "Charles Houston Bar Association Awards" Archived May 11, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Price and Associates. Retrieved February 23, 2011.
  4. ^ "Charles Hamilton Houston"Separate Is Not Equal: Brown v. Board of Education, Smithsonian National Museum of American History; exhibit has photos of Houston with his parents
  5. ^ https://www.culturaltourismdc.org/portal/charles-hamilton-houston-residence-african-american-heritage-trail. {{cite web}}Missing or empty |title= (help)
  6. ^ James Rawn Jr. (2010). Root and Branch: Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, and the Struggle to End Segregation. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
  7. ^ Conyers 2012, p5
  8. ^ "Howard University School of Law: Preparing for Struggle", Smithsonian National Museum of American History; accessed May 14, 2017
  9. ^ "Charles Hamilton - Biography". Archived from the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved September 3, 2015.
  10. Jump up to:a b NAACP History: "Charles Hamilton Houston" Archived January 9, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, NAACP; accessed May 14, 2017
  11. ^ Bradley, David (2014). Preface, The Historic Murder Trial of George Crawford: Charles H. Houston, the NAACP and the Case That Put All-White Southern Juries on Trial. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co. ISBN 978-0-7864-9468-2.
  12. ^ [Alfred L. Brophy, "Hollins v. State of Oklahoma (1935)"], The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture, www.okhistory.org (accessed May 15, 2017)
  13. ^ Liptak, Adam (August 16, 2015). "Exclusion of Blacks From Juries Raises Renewed Scrutiny (Published 2015)"The New York TimesISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 12, 2020.
  14. ^ Edelman, Gilad. "Why Is It So Easy for Prosecutors to Strike Black Jurors?"The New Yorker. Retrieved October 12, 2020.
  15. Jump up to:a b "Salaries Compared", Little John Explorers
  16. ^ "Presentation of Portrait of the Honorable William B. Bryant, Chief Judge" (PDF). Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit. April 18, 1980. Retrieved August 9, 2016. {{cite journal}}Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  17. Jump up to:a b Biography of Emmet Sullivan Archived August 13, 2016, at the Wayback Machine at District Court for the District of Columbia website
  18. Jump up to:a b J.Y. Smith (August 2, 1978). "Judge Joseph C. Waddy, 67, of U.S. District Court Here, Dies"The Washington Post. Retrieved August 9, 2016.
  19. Jump up to:a b Biography of Wendell Gardner Archived December 20, 2016, at the Wayback Machine at Superior Court of the District of Columbia website
  20. ^ Biography of Theodore Newman Archived February 3, 2017, at the Wayback Machine at District of Columbia Court of Appeals website
  21. ^ Leland B. Ware (1989), "Invisible Walls: An Examination of the Legal Strategy of the Restrictive Covenant Cases"Washington University Law Review, Vol. 67, Issue 3: Symposium on the State Action Doctrine of Shelley v. Kraemer, p. 744
  22. Jump up to:a b Ware (1989), "Invisible Walls", p.772
  23. ^ Jessie Carney Smith (ed.), "Houston, Charles Hamilton"Encyclopedia of African American Popular Culture, Greenwood, 2011 (pp. 701-704), p. 703.
  24. ^ Asante, Molefi Kete (2002). 100 Greatest African Americans: A Biographical Encyclopedia. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-57392-963-8.

Further reading[edit]

  • David Bradley, The Historic Murder Trial of George Crawford: Charles H. Houston, the NAACP and the Case That Put All-White Southern Juries on Trial. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co, 2014.
  • James L. Conyers, Jr. (ed.), Charles H. Houston: An Interdisciplinary Study of Civil Rights Leadership. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2012.
  • Richard Kluger, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality. New York: Vintage Books, 1977.
  • Kenneth W. Mack, Representing the Race: The Creation of the Civil Rights Lawyer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.
  • Genna Rae McNeil, Groundwork: Charles Hamilton Houston and the Struggle for Civil Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.
  • James Rawn, Jr., Root and Branch: Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, and the Struggle to End Segregation. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2010.

88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888


29 December 2008

Charles Hamilton Houston: The Man Who Killed Jim Crow

Skilled litigator and legal educator launches the assault on segregation

 
Charles Hamilton Houston argues a case. (Scurlock Studio Records, Archives Center, National Museum of American History, Behring Center, Smithsonian Institution)
The skilled litigator and legal educator Charles Hamilton Houston launched the legal assault on “Jim Crow” laws.

This article is excerpted from the book Free At Last: The U.S. Civil Rights Movement, published by the Bureau of International Information Programs. View the entire book (PDF, 3.6 MB).

Charles Hamilton Houston was born in 1895 in Washington, D.C. A brilliant student, he graduated as a valedictorian from Amherst College at the age of 19, then served in a segregated U.S. Army unit during the First World War. After his brush with racism in the Army, Houston determined to make the fight for civil rights his life’s calling. Returning home, he studied law at Harvard University, becoming the first African-American editor of its prestigious law review. He would go on to earn a PhD in juridical science at Harvard and a doctor of civil law degree at the University of Madrid in Spain.

Houston believed that an attorney’s proper vocation was to wield the law as an instrument for securing justice. “A lawyer’s either a social engineer or he’s a parasite on society,” he argued. In 1924, Houston began teaching part time at Howard University Law School, the Washington, D.C. institution responsible by some accounts for training fully three-fourths of the African-American attorneys then practicing. By 1929, Houston headed the law school.

One man standing by table, two sitting at table working (Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division)
Thurgood Marshall (left) and Houston (center), with Donald Gaines Murray, plaintiff in a key civil rights case.

In just six years, Houston radically improved the education of African-American law students, earned full accreditation for the school, and produced a group of lawyers trained in civil rights law. In the book Black Profiles, George R. Metcalf writes that Houston took the job to turn Howard into “a West Point [a popular name for the United States Military Academy] of Negro leadership, so that Negroes could gain equality by fighting segregation in the courts.”

Meanwhile, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People was laying the groundwork for a legal challenge to the separate-but-equal doctrine approved in the Supreme Court’s 1896 Plessy decision. On Houston’s recommendation, the organization engaged former U.S. Attorney Nathan Ross Margold to study the practical workings of separate but equal in the South. Margold’s report — 218 legal-sized-pages long — was completed in 1931. It documented woeful inequality in state expenditures between white and black segregated schools.

In 1934, Houston accepted the position of NAACP special counsel. He surrounded himself with a select group of young, mostly Howard-trained lawyers, among them James Nabrit, Spottswood Robinson III, A. Leon Higginbotham, Robert Carter, William Hastie, George E.C. Hayes, Jack Greenberg, and Oliver Hill. With his young protégé Thurgood Marshall often in tow, Houston began to tour the South, armed with a camera and a portable typewriter. Marshall later recalled that he and Houston traveled in Houston’s car: “There was no place to eat, no place to sleep. We slept in the car and we ate fruit.” This could be dangerous work, but the visual record Houston compiled and the data amassed by Margold would anchor a new legal strategy: If the facilities allocated to blacks were not equal to those afforded whites, Houston reasoned, segregationist states were not meeting even the Plessy standard. Separate but equal logically required those states either to improve drastically the black facilities, a hugely expensive undertaking, or else integrate.

This equalization strategy bore fruit in 1935, when Houston and Marshall prevailed in a Maryland case, Murray v. Pearson. The African-American plaintiff challenged his rejection by the segregated University of Maryland law school. The university’s lawyers argued that the school met the separate but equal requirement by granting qualified black applicants scholarships to enroll at out-of-state law schools. The state courts rejected this argument. While they were not yet prepared to rule against segregated public schools, they did hold that Maryland’s out-of-state option was not an equal opportunity. Maryland’s law school was ordered to admit qualified African-American students. The triumph was especially sweet for Marshall, who numbered himself among the qualified blacks rejected by the school.

Houston retired from the NAACP in 1940 because of ill health, and he died in 1950. “We owe it all to Charlie,” Marshall later remarked. While Houston’s prize student would lead the final legal assault on segregation, it was Houston, the teacher, who devised the strategy and illuminated the path.

888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

No comments:

Post a Comment